Central San Vicente, Inc. v. Sugar Board
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Pérez Pimentel
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Availing themselves of the provisions of § 3 of the Sugar Act — No. 426 of May 13, 1951 (Sess. Laws, p. 1138) — the respective administrators of the proportional-profit farms known as “Ingenio” and “San Antonio,” both owned by the Land Authority, gave notice in October, 1953 to the centrals ■concerned, through the Sugar Board, of their intention to .shift from Central San Vicente, Inc. to the Central Plazuela the grinding of 100 percent of their cane. The Central San Vicente, Inc. objected to the proposed change, alleging that it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Assn. of NewarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.