Legal Opinion

Sun Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1989No. Nos. 1648, 1668-1674, 1694-1704, and 1717-1721 C.D. 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Before us are twenty-four consolidated petitions for review.1 In each of the cases, a holder of a Philadelphia taxicab certificate has sought review of an order of the Public Utility Commission (commission) denying a request for reconsideration and rescission of the commission’s action.

The commission orders at issue denied reconsideration of commission actions directing various cab companies, individuals and/or businesses (Petitioners) to consolidate taxicab certificates under one corporate or trade name. For example, the facts in No. 1668 C.D.1988 are as follows. Dmilar Cab…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Carbonaire Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API