Baumgold Bros., Inc. v. Allan M. Fox Co.-East
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge.
The United States has moved for reconsideration of the Court’s denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiffs allege that this Court has jurisdiction between them and defendant Allan M. Fox Company — East on the basis of diversity (28 U.S.C. § 1332) and over the United States pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (2). The question before the Court is whether it has jurisdiction to consider suit for breach of contract between private litigants and at the same time enlarge that dispute to encompass a suit against…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baumgold Brothers, Inc. v. Allan M. Fox Company, EastDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1973
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. Flexwatt Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006