Legal Opinion

Baumgold Brothers, Inc. v. Allan M. Fox Company, East

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 20, 1973No. C 71-322PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

This is an action against the Allan M. Fox Company, East, seeking damages for breach of contract or, in the alternative, the conversion of property. Plaintiff is also suing the United States for breach of an insurance contract evolving from plaintiffs’ shipment of merchandise by registered mail. The case came on for trial before this Court on September 13, 1973, the parties having waived their right to trial by jury. The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P.

FINDING…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Frank E. Dorton and J. A. Castle, Partners, D/B/A the Carpet Mart v. Collins & Aikman Corporation and Painter Carpet Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Henderson v. Carbondale Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Charlson Realty Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Silver v. NelsonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
  3. Bischoff v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Conductron Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Central Jersey Dodge Truck Center, Inc. v. Sightseer Corporation and Prf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API