State v. Hilgendorf
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Mark Hilgendorf pled guilty to criminal possession of dangerous drugs and drug paraphernalia. Pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, Hilgendorf reserved the right to appeal the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of drugs, drug paraphernalia, and any statements made by him or his passenger on the ground that the arresting officer did not have particularized suspicion to stop his vehicle or a warrant to search a closed container seized at the scene. Hilgendorf appeals.
¶2 We affirm and state the issues on appeal as follows:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- State v. GopherMontana Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BerosikMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. M. ZeimerMontana Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. RodriguezMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PearsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. McKeeverMontana Supreme Court · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.