Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2011No. DA 10-0148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Appellant Thomas Gail Pearson (Pearson) appeals from an order of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, denying his motion to suppress and dismiss evidence. We affirm.

¶2 We review the following issues on appeal:

¶3 Whether the officers’ conduct exceeded the scope of Pearson’s traffic stop.

¶4 Whether the officers inevitably would have discovered the evidence obtained in the officers’ unwarranted second search of Pearson’s fanny pack.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶5 The State of Montana (State) charged Pearson with criminal possession of dangerous drugs, criminal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. GopherMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. CaseMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. D. HurlbertMontana Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. B. MeffordMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. CovingtonMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. D. BurtonMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. PearsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API