Legal Opinion
Strickland v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 31, 2006No. 03-1390CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER ON REMAND AND DAMAGES.
BRADEN, Judge.
On July 30, 2004, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Final Judgment holding that the Assistant Secretary of the Navy violated 10 U.S.C. § 1552(a)(1), by rejecting a Final Opinion of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (“BCNR”), recommending correction of Plaintiff’s record and three months of constructive service, so Plaintiff could qualify for retirement. See Strickland v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 443, 452-53 (2004) (“Strickland I”); see also Strickland v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 689, 691-92 (2004)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David C. Roth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Michael Strickland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Caddington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- United States Ex Rel. Pasela v. FennoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Fuentes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022