Williams v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of robbery and conspiracy in violation of §§ 6-4-401 and 6-1-203, W.S.1977. Appellant contends that he was denied his constitutional right to represent himself. He also contends that the trial court erred in refusing to hold a hearing during which he could attack the sufficiency of the affidavit supporting a search warrant.
We affirm.
I
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that a defendant in state court shall have the right to represent himself. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Hyde v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Ervin James Horton v. Richard L. Dugger, T.L. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Long v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.