Legal Opinion
Hardenberg v. Ray
United States Circuit Court
Decided January 23, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions
At Law. Action to recover possession of real property.
1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.
This action is brought to recover possession of the south half of lots numbered 2 and 7, in block 39, of Portland, according to ■the plat thereof, alleged to be worth over $5,000.
The plaintiff is a citizen of the state of New York. The action was brought against Charles Sliter, J. C. Miller, and W. H. West, the persons in the possession of the premises, who answered that they were in possession only as tenants of Thomas L. Ray, Rachel L. Ray, H. E. Ray, Mary E. Arbuckle, John De Witt Ray, and Sarah A. Ray, giving their residence, and asking that they might be substituted as defendants in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Clarke v. MathewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Dunn v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Herndon v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Taggart v. RisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Rockland v. Inhabitants of Hurricane IsleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
- Pape v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1931