Legal Opinion

United States v. Roberts

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 28, 2016No. NMCCA 201600119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

BRUBAKER, Chief Judge:

The United States petitions this court for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. It seeks relief from a lower court ruling finding evidence of general military character admissible, directly at odds with the recently-amended Military Rule of Evidenoe 404, Manual FOR Courts-Martial, United States (2012 ed.). We find the Government has met its burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted and thus grant the writ.

Background,

On 14 January 2016, Lieutenant (LT) Roberts, the Real Party in Interest, was arraigned…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. EvansNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  2. United States v. MoralesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API