Legal Opinion

Doochin v. Rackley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Chief Justice.

The facts in this case are not disputed and the sole issue is the constitutionality of Chapter 164 of the Tennessee Public Acts of 1977, codified at T.C.A. §§ 64-511 (Supp. 1980) and 58-1544(a)(6)(B) (Supp.1979). The second of these code sections has been repealed by the Tennessee Coal Surface Mining Law of 1980, enacted subsequent to the proceedings below. 1 See Ch. 908, 1980 Tenn.Public Acts, codified at T.C.A. § 59-8-301, et seq. (Supp.1980). Since the comparable provision of the 1980 Act has the same effect, we intend for this decision to encompass it as well.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Stewart v. ChernickySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Brown v. Crozer Coal & Land CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Phipps v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ward v. HardingKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  3. American Land Holdings of Indiana v. Stanley JobeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Rysavy v. NovotnySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Christensen v. Chromalloy American Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API