Legal Opinion

In re Mina

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1914No. 9581PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of George Mina, doing business as the Keystone Garage, bankrupt. On petition of the Pure Oil Company to reclaim property.

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, District Judge.

The Pure Oil Company claims the ownership of a certain pump for the measuring of gasoline, and as well certain equipment connected with sard pump, which was sold by it to the bankrupt upon a contract of conditional sale, and which is now in the hands of the receiver in bankruptcy.

The terms of the contract of conditional sale need not be set forth. The. contract was in writing, and generally provided for the retention of title in the conditional vendor until payment by the vendee of the purchase price. Such contracts have always been deemed good, as between the parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Clipper Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Hineman v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Christ v. ZehnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Durr v. ReplogleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. BaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. In Re United States Electrical Supply Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1924
  3. In re BelleDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API