Legal Opinion

Hineman v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1890No. 66PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL BY PLAINTIFF FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLI R3 OF YENANGO COUNTY. No. 66 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 57 August Term 1888, C. P. On June 28,1888, an appeal was entered by the defendant from the judgment of a justice of the peace in favor of P. J. Hineman against David Matthews. Issue.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY PLAINTIFF FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLI R3 OF YENANGO COUNTY. No. 66 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 57 August Term 1888, C. P. On June 28,1888, an appeal was entered by the defendant from the judgment of a justice of the peace in favor of P. J. Hineman against David Matthews. Issue. At tbe trial on May 21, 1889, the plaintiff submitted evidence tending to show that in November, 1887, he sold to Gay-lord Minium certain timber, with a distinct agreement, as was claimed and testified, that the title to the timber was not to pass by the sale until the vendee had paid the…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION,

Mb. Justice Stebbett:

Plaintiff’s contention is that, as between himself and Gaylord Minium, the transaction was a conditional sale of the timber; that, according to the terms of their agreement, the title was not to pass until the timber was paid for, and the vendee having failed to pay within the time agreed upon, plaintiff resumed possession of the property, before the defendant or any of the vendee’s creditors acquired any right thereto, by levy, sale, or otherwise, and that the jury would have been warranted by the evidence in finding these facts. If that position be correct, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maynes v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  2. Brunswick & Balke Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  3. Krause v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. Smyth v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  5. Hill v. Nation Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Finch v. Conrade'sSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Wickes Bros. v. Island Park Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Holly Manuf'g Co. v. New Chester Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Speers v. KnarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. In re East End Mantel & Tile Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API