Legal Opinion

Huttinger v. GC Murphy Company

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1961No. 19,302PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelley, J.

At the conclusion of appellant’s evidence, the court, upon motion of appellee, directed the jury to return a verdict for the latter. The propriety of such action by the court is the material question presented by the record herein.

Appellee operates a retail store in Fort Wayne, Indiana. On March 1, 1947 said store was' open for the transaction of business and for entry by prospective customers. On said day it snowed most of the day. At about 1:30 o’clock P. M. of said day, appellant entered appellee’s said store for the purpose of making a purchase of merchandise. Other customers had entered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whitaker, Admr. v. BorntragerIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Gregory v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Slinkard v. Babb, WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Orey v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of N.Y.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Balzer v. WaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. SPIDEL ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1964
  2. FW Woolworth Co. v. StokesMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Stover v. FechtmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Ruth Hetzel v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. Bradford v. ChismIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API