Legal Opinion

Citizens for Implementing Medical Marijuana v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2006No. S-11345PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Citizens for Implementing Medical Marijuana (CIMM) sued the Municipality of Anchorage and Municipal Clerk Greg Moyer after Clerk Moyer refused to certify CIMM’s citizen initiative petition and submit its ballot proposition to municipal voters. Because we conclude that the petition is confusing and misleading and therefore legally insufficient, we affirm the superior court’s summary judgment that held that the clerk properly denied certification.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On April 10, 2002, Citizens for Implementing Medical Marijuana submitted an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Yute Air Alaska, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kodiak Island Borough v. MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Alaska v. CampbellAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Sitkans for Responsible Government v. City & Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections, and Kevin Meyer, in an official capacity v. Vote Yes for Alaska's Fair ShareAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Planned Parenthood of Alaska v. CampbellAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Planned Parenthood of Alaska v. CampbellAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API