Chrysler Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff filed a complaint for superintending control, challenging the propriety of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board review of a delayed appeal from an order of the hearing referee approving plaintiff’s redemption agreement with James Ashton. We grant superintending control on the ground that the wcab lacked jurisdiction to entertain a delayed appeal from a redemption order.
Initially, we note that superintending control is premised upon the power of the court to compel a lower court or tribunal, including an administrative agency with judicial or quasi-judicial powers, to perform a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In RE PEOPLE v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Beer v. City of Fraser Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Chrysler Corp. v. Civil Rights CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- East Jordan Iron Works v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hill v. City of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Jacobs v. Technidisc, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006