Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1988No. Docket No. 93069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed a complaint for superintending control, challenging the propriety of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board review of a delayed appeal from an order of the hearing referee approving plaintiff’s redemption agreement with James Ashton. We grant superintending control on the ground that the wcab lacked jurisdiction to entertain a delayed appeal from a redemption order.

Initially, we note that superintending control is premised upon the power of the court to compel a lower court or tribunal, including an administrative agency with judicial or quasi-judicial powers, to perform a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In RE PEOPLE v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Beer v. City of Fraser Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. Civil Rights CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. East Jordan Iron Works v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Jacobs v. Technidisc, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API