Legal Opinion

Kemble v. Metropolitan District Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 26, 2000No. 98-P-1064PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

The question before us is whether, as matter of law, an outdoor stairway leading to a pedestrian overpass is to be considered a sidewalk for the purposes of G. L. c. 92, § 36. The question arises because the plaintiff, Peter Kemble, claims to have been injured while descending the stairway, which extends from a pedestrian overpass at the Charles Street circle area of the Charles River reservation in Boston. Pedestrians use the overpass to access the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s (MBTA) Charles Street subway station as well as to cross over to the other side of Charles Street.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Zone Book, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Police Department v. FedorchukMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. Longo v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seideman v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. McCormick v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API