Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 4, 2017No. 17–P–80Published

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff sued the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) for negligence after sustaining injuries in a fall at the MBTA's Babcock Street station. A Superior Court judge ordered summary judgment for the MBTA, reasoning that the platform where the injury occurred was a "way" within the meaning of G. L. c. 84, § 15, and that the plaintiff had not served the MBTA with notice of his injuries within thirty days as required by G. L. c. 84, § 18. On appeal, the plaintiff assigns error to the judge's conclusion that the platform is a way. We affirm.

Background. We summarize the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. HendricksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Doherty v. Town of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Annese Electrical Services, Inc. v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Chace v. CurranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API