Legal Opinion

Ex Parte McIver

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1979No. 60072Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

PHILLIPS, Judge.

A panel of this Court, in a decision which we are now asked by the State to reconsider, held that a jury does not have the authority under Article 42.12, V.A.C.C.P., to assess a defendant’s punishment at a term of confinement and a fine, with only the fine being probated.

In its motion for rehearing, the State relies on Section 1 of Article 42.12, supra, which provides in part:

*855It is the purpose of this Article to place wholly within the State courts of appropriate jurisdiction the responsibility for determining when the imposition of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. County of Harris v. CrookerTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Peterson v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners in OptometryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. City of Dallas v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API