Ex Parte McIver
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
PHILLIPS, Judge.
A panel of this Court, in a decision which we are now asked by the State to reconsider, held that a jury does not have the authority under Article 42.12, V.A.C.C.P., to assess a defendant’s punishment at a term of confinement and a fine, with only the fine being probated.
In its motion for rehearing, the State relies on Section 1 of Article 42.12, supra, which provides in part:
*855It is the purpose of this Article to place wholly within the State courts of appropriate jurisdiction the responsibility for determining when the imposition of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- County of Harris v. CrookerTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Peterson v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners in OptometryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- City of Dallas v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966