Legal Opinion
Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund of Illumination Products Industry
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 12, 1973No. 73-C-663PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action for declaratory and injunctive relief against The Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products Industry (Retirement Fund) and the trustees thereof, alleging a violation by defendants of Section 302 of the Taft-Hartley Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 186 (the Act) in denying plaintiff’s application for benefits under the Retirement Fund, and also claiming damages. Jurisdiction is alleged under Section 302(c)(5) and (e) of the Act, as well as under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337.
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(1)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wheeldin v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Taylor Roark v. John L. Lewis, Maude W. Reese, of the Last Will and Testament of Joe S. Rees(e) v. John L. Lewis, Theo R. Fuller v. John L. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Danti v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund v. DemisaySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Juan Sanchez Lugo v. The Employees Retirement Fund of the Illumination Products IndustryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Associated Contractors of Essex County, Inc. v. Laborers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Ellis M. Hurn v. Retirement Fund Trust of the Plumbing, Heating and Piping Industry of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.