Legal Opinion

State v. Dellisanti

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 20, 2010PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA

Defendant Frank Dellisanti was not in the courtroom when, during the jury’s deliberations, the trial court responded to two questions posed by the jury and when the jury returned its verdict. The record provided limited insight into what had transpired leading up to defendant’s absence during those final events of his trial. Unfortunately, that led the Appellate Division and *448this Court, initially, to perceive that defendant’s absence from the courtroom during the concluding events of the trial was due to circumstances brought about by the execution of an unrelated warrant for his arrest…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. State v. FrisbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. State v. AuldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. A.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. State v. ReeveyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  3. State v. Bruno Gibson (072257)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. State v. TedescoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  5. State of New Jersey v. Jerome L. FaucetteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API