Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kittler v. Kelsch

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1927Published

1DissentBurr, J.

I am compelled to dissent in this case. I have no quarrel with the principles set forth in the syllabus. As an abstract proposition this may be correct, though the phrase “the sufficiency of the evidence within his own knowledge” may be open to discussion as to whether it refers to the complaint or to his official actions in the prosecution. The issue involved in this case is- — May the state’s attorney swear positively to a complaint on his own initiative and be free from liability without regard to truth or falsehood ?

The complaint shows that the defendant, as state’s attorney, received an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Griffith v. SlinkardIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Watts v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Turpen v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Downer v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API