Brock v. Farmer

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

Bingham Farmer sued W. A. Brock on a $1,500 promissory note. The defenses were non est factum, statute of limitations, material alteration, and that Farmer was a co*532maker, the note never having been negotiated. The appeal is from a- judgment in favor of Farmer for the full amount sought.

Appellee’s testimony showed that he loaned Earl Brock, the deceased son of appellant, $300 prior to, 1938, with appellant as surety. Some time later, appellant borrowed $1200 from appellee and made one note of $1500 for the entire indebtedness. This' note was renewed, and the renewal note was…