Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Meadows

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1994No. D-3659PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Per curiam

Of the many issues petitioner has raised in this appeal, the one we find dispositive is whether the trial court properly instructed the jury as to the elements of fraud. We hold that it did not.

Lawrence Meadows, a Sears Roebuck & Co. employee for 29 years and manager of a store electronics department, was indirectly involved in an incident which led to a customer leaving the store with merchandise, but without the documentation of sale required by Sears policy. The store manager, Glen Stranahan, happened upon the customer and initiated an investigation. Several days later, Stranahan called…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Stone v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Berneda R. O'Shea v. Commercial Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Mirta Zorrilla v. Aypco Construction II, LLC and Jose Luis MunozTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Farah v. Mafrige & Kormanik, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  5. Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API