Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Nygaard

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1935No. 7,290PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion:

2Per curiam

Thomson brought this action against Nygaard to recover possession of certain coal mining property situated in Chouteau county. H. G. Lescher, trustee, hereinafter called intervener, upon leave of court filed a complaint in intervention, claiming to be the owner of the same property as well as additional lands. On his petition and upon order of court, W. B. Sands, Henry Wedeking and Dan Sargent were made parties defendant. Wedeking filed a disclaimer of any interest in any of the property. Sargent, Nygaard and Sands each separately filed an answer to the complaint in intervention,…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Gold & Sapphire Mining Co. v. StruthersMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Martin v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Le Vasseur v. RoullmanMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. RolioUtah Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. Texas CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. West v. Capital Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. EAGLE PASS REALTY COMPANY v. EsparzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Polson Sheep Co. v. OwenMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Flathead Lumber Corp. v. EverettMontana Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API