Legal Opinion

In Re Trupp

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 2004No. 03SA344PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. Introduction

This is the second time that this attorney regulation case has come before this court. In the prior decision, People v. Trupp ("Trupp I "), we held that: Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) applies to attorney regulation proceedings; the presiding disciplin ary judge has exclusive authority over a C.R.C.P. 11(a) motion; and only the assistant attorney regulation counsel who signed the complaint is answerable to the motion. 51 P.3d 985 (Colo.2002). In that earlier case, we did not decide whether the assistant attorney regulation counsel had violated Rule 11(a). Instead, we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jagow v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. E-470 Public Highway Authority v. JagowColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Stepanek v. Delta CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. TruppSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Murry v. GuideOne Specialty Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In re FosterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Crosby v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. SRS, Inc. v. SouthwardColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Houser v. CenturyLinkColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API