Houser v. CenturyLink
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY
August 22, 2024
2024COA96
No. 23CA1214, Houser v. CenturyLink — Civil Procedure —
Signing of Pleadings — Obligations of Parties and Attorneys —
Borrowing Plausibility — Reasonable Inquiry — Pleading
Grounded in Fact
In this case, a division of the court of appeals considers, as a
matter of first impression in Colorado, whether an attorney’s
inquiry is objectively reasonable under C.R.C.P. 11(a) if the attorney
copies confidential witnesses’ factual statements from a complaint
in another case without speaking to the confidential witnesses to
confirm their statements. After reviewing federal cases…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Pontiac Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement System v. UBS AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- In Re Morgan Stanley Information Fund SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.