Legal Opinion

Krauss v. Fry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 10, 1945No. 37539PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Jake, Albert, and Gordon Krauss, who by deed dated January 8, 1938, acquired from Louis Fry a half interest in the Argyle Plantation in Tensas' Parish, Louisiana, instituted this suit against Fry’s widow and heir to have the reservation made by the vendor in such deed construed to entitle them to a one-fourth interest in and to all of the oil, gas, or other minerals in or under the property. In the alternative, that should the reservation be found to be ambiguous, then that the intention of the parties be looked into from the evidence in the record; in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holloway Gravel Co. v. McKowenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Reynaud v. BullockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Franton v. RuscaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  4. Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Badon v. BadonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Averyt v. Grande, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. BonierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Di Cristina v. WeiserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  4. American Creosote Company v. SpringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  5. Campo v. LaNasaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API