Franton v. Rusca

FOURNET, Justice.

■ This is a' suit • for damages in the sum of $98-, instituted - by the purchaser, under an unconditional warranty deed, óf a certain tract of land containing. 120 arpents, more or less, on account of the vendor’s failure to deliver possession of a, portion of the property, which damages he alleged were for “ * * * the value of the use of the land of .which.-he has been deprived, and-loss of time, and. expenses,?’.etc.

The defendant first filed an exception of vagueness and, subsequently, exceptions of no cause and no right of action. The latter exceptions were overruled, but…