Legal Opinion
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1998No. 96-36027PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
The State of Oregon (“Oregon”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment grant *483in favor of the Confederated Tribés of Siletz Indians in the Tribe’s action under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. • §§ 2701-2721, enjoining Oregon from public release of a state investigative report concerning the Chinook Winds gambling casino. We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Congress passed the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721, “to provide a statutory basis for the operation and regulation of gaming by Indian…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Covey v. Hollydale Mobilehome EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Andrew H.K. Wong v. The Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of LedyardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Cates v. California Gambling Control CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.