Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Barchman

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 28, 1996No. 95 C 6466Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHAD UR, Senior District Judge.

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (“Merrill Lynch”), Laurie Jones Canady (“Canady”) and Stephen Lyders (“Lyders”) have brought this action pursuant to Federal Arbitration Act (“Act”) § 4, 9 U.S.C. § 4, to address several issues of claimed noneompli-anee with the arbitration agreement under which eight claimants 1 have brought a consolidated arbitration claim before the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). 2 For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, Respondents’ motion adverted to in n. 3 is granted in part and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API