Legal Opinion

In re Jordan

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 20, 1943No. 314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

The debtor, in a proceeding under Section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, has filed objections and exceptions to the Report and Recommendations of the Supervising Conciliation Commissioner which approves the allowance of the joint motion of the secured creditors for the dismissal of the proceeding on the ground that the petitioning debtor is not a farmer, within the definition of Section 75, sub. r. The issue thus tendered has been presented to the court after due notice.

The commissioner has found the relevant facts; and upon a careful analysis of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Mulligan v. Federal Land Bank of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Shyvers v. Security-First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Benitez v. Bank of Nova ScotiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  5. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. MoserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. Jordan v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. In re N. H. Development Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API