Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Federal Land Bank
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 27, 1943No. 12608PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The important question presented by this appeal is whether the determination by the Supervising Conciliation Commissioner and by the District Court that the debtor (appellant), at the time he filed his petition under § 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S. C.A. § 203, was not a farmer within the definition of § 75, sub. r of the Act, 11 U. S.C.A. § 203 sub. r1, is erroneous.
The debtor, who owned a large ranch in Cherry County, Nebraska, filed his petition on August 13, 1942. It was approved and referred to a Conciliation Commissioner August 18, 1942. The first meeting of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Kauk v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Mulligan v. Federal Land Bank of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Davis v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Federal Land Bank v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jordan v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Smith v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Von Leidersdorff v. City Mortgage & Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950