Chappell v. Palmer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GINSBURG, J. *
This is an appeal from an adverse jury verdict in an action brought by appellant, a passenger in an automobile, against respondents, the minor driver and his parents. A previous trial resulted in a nonsuit, which was reversed on appeal (Chappell v. Palmer, 236 Cal.App.2d 34 [45 Cal.Rptr. 686]).
Appellant raises in this appeal the sole issue of the propriety of the instructions given the jury concerning the meaning of the term “wilful misconduct.” Respondents contend that there was no error in the instructions, and raise as an additional issue the claim that the record…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New v. Consolidated Rock Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Mittelman v. SeifertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Kelley v. Von KuznickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Mittelman v. SeifertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- New v. Consolidated Rock Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985