Legal Opinion
Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 19, 1998No. 97-1354UnknownCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Gary E. Hindes, and other shareholders, of Meritor Savings Bank (“Meritor”), appeal from various district court orders dismissing their claims against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Pennsylvania Secretary of Banking (“Secretary”). Appellants contend that the appellees wrongfully seized Meritor, thereby depriving them of their substantive due process rights. More particularly, appellants allege that the FDIC reneged on an agreement with Meritor with respect to the computation of its capital base, ignored…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998