Hotchkiss v. Darling
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
Plaintiff filed this action to quiet title to certain lots in the city of Selma. The defendants filed a cross-complaint asking that their title be quieted as against the plaintiff. The defendants alleged and proved a sale of the lots to them by a trustee under the terms of a trust deed given by the plaintiff to the defendants to secure a note for $2,500. This appeal is taken from a judgment quieting title to the lots in the defendants, the only questions raised relating to the validity of the sale under the trust deed.
It is first contended that the notice of sale, as published, did not comply…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Estate of SankeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Foster v. VehmeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- In re the Estate of SbarboroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Mintzer v. SchillingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- W. Berkeley Land Co. v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Glass v. BenkertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Chambers v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978