Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Standard Insurance
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided November 21, 2006No. 06-0177-CV-W-DWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHIPPLE, District Court.
Before the Court is Defendant Standard Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 12). Plaintiff filed suggestions in opposition (Doc. 15) and Defendant filed a reply (Doc. 16). After reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court finds no genuine issue of material fact suggesting Plaintiff is entitled to relief. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
FACTS
Robert Hamilton, Plaintiffs husband, was employed by Albertsons, Inc (“Albert-sons”). Albertsons provided its eligible employees, via an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Get Away Club, Inc. v. Vic Coleman, Jim SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Drexel Finley and Grace Finley v. Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Sheila Hamilton v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Sheila Hamilton v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008