Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1921No. 6142PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court1 of Nacogdoches County of receiving stolen property of value less than fifty dollars and his punishment fixed at thirty days in the County jail and a fine of one hundred dollars.

Appellant received the property in question from one, Joe Blount, who was alleged to have acquired same by theft. The State, proved a confession made by Blount, part of which is as follows: “Joe Blount told me, among other things, that he had stolen, about the 15th of February, 1920, a pair of shoes and two suits of underwear from Tucker-Hayter & Company,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Forrester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Grande, Jr. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Stanfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Browney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Pine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API