Legal Opinion

Citizens' Bank v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1933No. 8 Div. 504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

On certiorari, petitioner stresses the fact that the petition for mandamus discloses this was a claim suit in detinue under Code, § 7403, not a claim suit for trial of right of property levied upon under execution, section 10375, Code.

Judgment went for the plaintiff and against, the claimant for the property sued for or its alternative value, assessed as per statute. Slaughter v. Webster, 194 Ala. 642, 70 So. 128.

It is here insisted the judgment was, therefore, one “for the payment of money” within the meaning of Code, § 6138. This extension of the married woman’s appeal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Scott v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Ex Parte BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Slaughter v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Guy v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Balls v. CrumpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Ex Parte LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Lacy v. Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API