Legal Opinion

Dustin Heintzman v. Lincoln Financial Group

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 5, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01755Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Dustin Heintzman, No. CV-25-01755-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Lincoln Financial Group, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court are three motions filed by pro se Plaintiff Dustin 16 Heintzman. (Docs. 6, 25, 26.) They include a “Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject 17 Matter Jurisdiction With Respect to State Law Claims Alleging Fraud and Motion for 18 Sanctions and Penalties Against Defendant and Their Attorneys,” (Doc. 6); “Plaintiff’s 19 Formal Response to Court Order Dated September 3, 2025…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API