Legal Opinion

Olmsted & Gillelen v. Hesla

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1922No. Civil No. 2020PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This action involves the power of the highway commission of Yavapai county, Arizona, to employ the appellants as designing, consulting and supervising engineers of the construction and improvement of the highways of the said county, authorized by an election held on May 8, 1920, at which bonds in the amount of $1,500,000 were voted to provide funds for such construction and improvement.

The contract employing appellants was entered into between them and the highway commission on June 16, 1921, covering the whole period of the construction and improvement contemplated, and obligated the highway…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Egan v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Randolph v. GroscostArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Pima County v. GrossettaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Board of Supervisors v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Oracle School District No. 2 v. Mammoth High School District No. 88Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API