Legal Opinion

Perry v. Carter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1935No. 25385PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, C. J.

This action involves the constitutionality of chapter 33, Okla. Session Laws 1925 (sections 611 to 615, O. S. 1931), which deals with the garnishment of moneys due from the state and municipal corporations to persons, firms, corporations, and partnerships.

Plaintiffs are employees of the state of Oklahoma and seek to restrain the State Auditor from withholding 25 per cent, of their wages and salaries which have been impounded through garnishment proceedings by virtue of the provisions of said chapter 33, supra.

The sole contention made by the plaintiffs in error 1s that the said chapter was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. LyttakerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lancey v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Seattle Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Waterbury v. Board of CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Gibson Products Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Grable v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Hayes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. National Mutual Casualty Co. v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API