Legal Opinion
In Re Beasley
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided May 8, 2006No. 06-70046PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARY P. GORMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue before this Court is how the new requirement imposed on Chapter 13 debtors of an “applicable commitment period” for Chapter 13 plan payments should be interpreted. Londale Beasley, the Debtor, filed his Fourth Amended Chapter 13 Plan and seeks to have it confirmed. John H. Germeraad, the Chapter 13 Trustee, objected to confirmation on several grounds, including an alleged failure by the Debtor to propose plan payments for a properly-calculated applicable commitment period. The Debtor asserts that the applicable commitment period is three…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re JassUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2006
- United States v. William J. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re: Judith K. Baker, Debtor. Appeal Of: Claire Ann ResopCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re DewUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2006
- In Re RisherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
- In Re MullenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2007
- In Re GrantUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
- In Re StansellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.