Legal Opinion

Darby v. L. G. De Felice & Son, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1950No. Civ. A. 10972PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

The plaintiffs brought the within action to recover damages for the alleged unlawful entry and negligent and unlawful conduct on their lands by the defendant. After filing an answer in which it denied liability, the defendant filed a third-party complaint against the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission asserting that in the event the plaintiffs recover any judgment against the defendant the third-party defendant, the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, will be liable to the defendant for reasons which are stated in paragraph 2 of said third-party complaint. The Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Board of Trustees of the Ohio State UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Louisiana Highway Commission v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  3. Hunkin-Conkey Const. Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Gray v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
  5. Sussan v. StrasserDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Specter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Eastern Motor Express, Inc. v. EspenshadeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Litton RCS, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Garrett v. BamfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Linger v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API