Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Bamford
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 11, 1978No. 77-2556PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
When this case was previously before us in 1976, Garrett v. Bamford, 538 F.2d 63, (Garrett I), we determined that the Pennsylvania statutory procedure to review county real estate tax assessments did not provide appellants with the “plain, speedy and efficient remedy” in Pennsylvania courts to make operative the prohibition of the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341. Thereafter, in 1977, obviously in response to our decision, Pennsylvania amended the tax assessment statutory review procedure. This appeal requires us to decide if the legislative…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In Re 42 PA. C. S. § 1703Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Murtagh v. County of BerksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Dewitt Dillon, Cross-Appellants v. The State of Montana, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- General Motors Corp. v. City of LindenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.