Legal Opinion

State v. Mossburg, 15-06-10 (7-2-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 2007No. 15-06-10PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Paul Mossburg, appeals the judgment of the Van Wert County Court of Common Pleas convicting him of one count of grand theft of a motor vehicle. On appeal, Mossburg asserts that the trial court erred in failing to grant his Crim.R. 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal; that his conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence; and, that the trial court erred in allowing the State to call an undisclosed rebuttal witness to testify without allowing him a continuance to prepare. Based on the following, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

{¶ 2} In…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HowtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. ElliotOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. Graewe, 2007 Ap 10 0070 (9-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API