Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lawrence W. Green v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 4, 1965No. 17841Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BAZELON, Chief Judge, with whom WRIGHT, Circuit Judge,

concurs, dissenting.

I think this robbery conviction must be reversed for new trial, for the reasons stated in my dissent from this court’s, recent opinion in Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331, 346 F.2d 812, decided April 23, 1965. No indication appears in the record that the question of competency, raised by defense counsel’s motion for mental examination, was ever judicially resolved. Here, as in Whalem, psychiatric opinion on the issue was expressed in the most conclusory boiler-plate language. Thus the record was fatally…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Thomas W. Whalem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  5. Edith L. Hough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API