Legal Opinion
B.J. Burleson v. James Saffle, and Drew Edmondson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2002No. 00-6254PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 27.1 and Okla. Stat. tit. 20, § 1602, hereby respectfully submits to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals a certified question of OMahoma law. The answer to this question, which is not clearly provided by OMahoma law, may be determinative of the above-captioned matter now pending before this Court.
The Question 1
On August 1, 1997, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals held that “where a vehicle is used to facilitate the intentional discharge of a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Paul Eichwedel v. Brad CurryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- STATE ex rel. MATLOFF v. WALLACECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
- Kelly Volpe v. Ginine TrimCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Chapman v. LeMasterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Burleson v. SaffleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.