Legal Opinion

Hanby v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1933No. 3491PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

A petition was filed by tbe taxpayer to review a decision of tbe Board of Tax Appeals affirming tbe Commissioner’s determination of additional income and excess profits taxes for tbe years 1917, 1918, 1919, 1920, and 1921. Tbe sum of the deficiencies of tbe taxes in these years, as so approved, is $22,829.-64, to which penalties in the amount of $20,-556.35 have been added. For the year 1917 there was imposed under R. S. § 3176, as amended by section 16 of the Revenue Act of 1916 (39 Stat. 756, 775), a penalty of 50 per cent, of the excess profits tax, for failure to make…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clifford O. Boren, Delta M. Boren and Clifford O. Boren Contracting Co., Inc. v. Lloyd M. Tucker, Special Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Boulez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  3. Mauch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Kenney v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  5. Parks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API