Legal Opinion

Stone v. Commonwealth Finance Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGavegan, J.

For present purposes, defendant may be regarded as identical with another corporation which it succeeded. Clarity and brevity will be served by referring to the corporation thus replaced as defendant. There was a subsidiary referred to herein as the Expositions Company.

The complaint shows that it was planned to have the subsidiary corporation establish a trade or commercial exposition at Buenos Aires; that to this end it sought and obtained contracts with prospective exhibitors who made payments for space, facilities and advertising and went to expense preparing their exhibits; that defendant…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Bogley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Asbury v. Hugh L. Bates Lodge No. 686Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Thomas T. Keane, Sr. v. Charles A. Gartrell, Trading as Charles A. Gartrell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Callophone Co. v. A. Jaeckel & Co.New York City Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API